Legal Opinion
United States v. Manchel, Lundy and Lessin
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 24, 1979No. Civ. A. 79-174PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
The question in this case is whether a taxpayer may intervene in a proceeding brought by the government to obtain financial records kept by a law firm which formerly employed him.
The United States and Special Agent James W. Cinelli, Jr., (government) have issued an Internal Revenue Service (IRS) summons pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7602 directing Manchel, Lundy and Lessin, a law partnership which employed Louis Kurland, Esquire, from 1973 to 1975, to produce its business records as they pertain to his employment. Mr. Kurland instructed Manchel, Lundy and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Donaldson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Reisman v. CaplinSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. BlueSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Gerald J. Rapp and Mary H. Rapp v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Robert S. Brewer, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Tomburello v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
- Ungaro v. Desert Palace, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.