Legal Opinion
Woodbridge & Turner Engineering Co. v. Ritter
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided September 16, 1895No. 30PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Tills was an action at law by tlie Woodbridge & Turner Engineering Company against J. Rush Ritter upon a judgment rendered by the supreme court of the state of RTeiv Jersey. Rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense.
1Opinion of the Court
DALLAS, Circuit Judge.
’This action is brought on a judgment of the supreme court of the state of .ISTew Jersey. The affidavit of def-nse sets forth:
“* * * That the said exemplification of record attached to the plaintiff’s statement of claim in this ease is not the full and complete record of the proceedings in said cause in said supreme court of tlie state of New Jersey as the same appeared of record and existed on the files of the said office of the clerk of said court at the time of tlie alleged attestation of said exemplifica*678tion at the time of the date thereof, namely, July G, 1S95, in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Union Trust Co. v. Rochester & P. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1886
3Cited by6 opinions
- Slade v. DickinsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1949
- A. Coolot Co. v. L. Kahner & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1905
- Grynberg v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Fehr v. McHughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Spencer v. BarnesOregon Supreme Court · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.