Legal Opinion

People v. Newman

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 2016No. B266704PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, P.

Newman appeals from the postjudgment order denying his petition for recall of his sentence on his conviction for assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)) 1 and for resentencing pursuant to section 1170.126, which was added by Proposition 36 (or Act). 2 He contends the court (Proposition 36 court) erred in determining he was ineligible for resentencing based on its finding he intended to inflict great bodily injury, because although the “court was permitted to examine the entire record of conviction, it could not rely on that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. People v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API