Legal Opinion

Atlantic Aviation Investments LLC v. MatlinPatterson Global Advisers LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Under the plain language of the parties’ memorandum of understanding (MOU) and the embedded make-whole agreement, nonparty VarigLog was an “affiliate” of Volo, an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the MP Funds. The sale of the shares at issue was an “Exit,” as expressly defined in the MOU. Under the make-whole agreement, Volo and the MP Funds are obligated to ratably share with plaintiff the funds received by *462VarigLog, Yolo’s affiliate, in connection with the sale of shares. We find that the parties’ agreements are unambiguous. Thus, there is no need to resort to extrinsic evidence to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. South Road Associates, LLC v. International Business Machines Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Aviation Investments LLC v. MatlinPatterson Global Advisers LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Atlantic Aviation Investments LLC v. MatlinPatterson Global Advisers LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API