Legal Opinion

In re Marcus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 16, 2009PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

By order of the Supreme Court of the State of California filed November 30, 2007, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, the execution of the suspension was stayed, and the respondent was placed on probation for three years on condition that he would be suspended for nine months. Although the aforementioned order addressed only the imposition of discipline, the order incorporated by reference the findings and conclusions of the Review Department of the California State Bar Court set forth in an order filed August 9, 2007. As…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re KerseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re HermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of StanwyckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Matter of MarcusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API