Legal Opinion

Fuller v. Consolidated Rural High-School District No. 1

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 27, 1934No. 31,480PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

The action was one by a school teacher to recover from a consolidated school district on her written contract to teach school made with one of the districts entering into the consolidation. Plaintiff recovered, and defendant appeals.

*882Pursuant to the practice of engaging- teachers in the spring for the school year beginning the next fall, the board of a school district, which, for convenience, may be called the Louisville district, entered into a contract with plaintiff to teach school for a térm of nine months, commencing September 7, 1931.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Thompson v. AbbottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  3. Hoffield v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baker v. Consolidated Rural Highschool District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Shirley v. School Board of School District No. 58Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2008
  4. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API