Legal Opinion

Willcox v. Stern

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur Markewich, J.

Respondents seek to reargue a motion to dismiss the petition, heretofore denied, on the ground that the court’s prior decision overlooked a controlling principle of law. Further, it is sought to renew the earlier motion as based upon a claimed incomplete statement of facts, the complete. statement being supplied on this application. The motion is granted in both respects, the prior decision of August' 7, 1964, recalled, and the matter considered de novo.

This article 78 proceeding brings up for review the action of the Superintendent of Insurance (“ Superintendent ”) in approving a merger of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eisenberg v. Central Zone Property Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yoss v. SacksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  2. Willcox v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  3. Lewis v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Walter J. Schloss Associates v. Arkwin Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API