Legal Opinion

United States v. Montgomery

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided March 19, 2014No. 2:11-cr-20044-JPM-1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*806ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS THE “SPECIAL FINDINGS” FROM THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT, AND TO STRIKE THE NOTICE OF INTENT TO SEEK THE DEATH PENALTY BECAUSE IT FAILS TO ADEQUATELY NARROW DEFENDANT’S ELIGIBILITY FOR THE DEATH PENALTY, MEET HEIGHTENED STANDARDS OF RELIABILITY, IS VAGUE AND DUPLICATIVE AND OVERLY BROAD (ECF NO. 141);

DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE STATUTORY AGGRAVATORS (ECF NO. 142); DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE THE NON-STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTORS FOR FAILURE TO INCLUDE THEM IN THE INDICTMENT (ECF NO. 143); DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS/STRIKE NON-STATUTORY AGGRAVATING FACTOR CONCERNING…

2Cases cited100 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. C. v. RashidDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
  2. Scheibe v. Fit Foods Distribution Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
  3. United States v. CaroDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API