Bradley v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court of Leflore county. Hon. S. F. Davis, Judge. Norman Bradley was convicted of uttering a forged check, and he appeals. From the brief of the learned attorney-general which is eminently fair, the state did not introduce any evidence of the check set forth in the indictment and which appears therein at page 4 of the record and it offered no proof as to the forgery or uttering of this check.
Read the full summary
Appeal from circuit court of Leflore county. Hon. S. F. Davis, Judge. Norman Bradley was convicted of uttering a forged check, and he appeals. From the brief of the learned attorney-general which is eminently fair, the state did not introduce any evidence of the check set forth in the indictment and which appears therein at page 4 of the record and it offered no proof as to the forgery or uttering of this check. Brief of assistant attorney-general, page 2. This fact we have argued, and this fact now the attorney-general concedes. Therefore, we say that it is now agreed by both sides in the…
1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.
The appellant, Norman -Bradley, appeals from a conviction on a charge of uttering a forged check. The indictment charged the uttering of a certain check dated September 26,1918, for the sum of eighty-two dollars, while the proof offered by the state to sustain the indictment showed that the appellant uttered a check dated December 20, 1918, for eighty-two dollars and fifteen cents. This latter check was introduced in evidence by the state, but the check set out in the indictment was not introduced, nor was there any'proof that the check set out in the indictment was forged. Due objection was…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Graves v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1927