Legal Opinion

County of Oakland v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 20, 2013No. 12-2135, 12-2136PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

The State and County plaintiffs sued the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac), and the Federal Housing and Finance Agency in an effort to collect state and local real estate transfer taxes that plaintiffs claim are owed for real property transfers made by defendants. Congress expressly exempted all three defendants from “all [state and local] taxation.” In an effort to get around the plain language of the exemption statutes, plaintiffs argue that when Congress exempted' the defendants from…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Gwaltney of Smithfield, Ltd. v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. National Federation of Independent Business v. SebeliusSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Jimenez v. QuartermanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Paul Mik, Jr. v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Carole Hughes v. John McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
  3. Hennepin County v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  4. Delaware County v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. DeKalb County v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API