Legal Opinion

Rudder v. Ponder

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1956No. A-5192PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Griffin

This is a suit to establish a vacancy along the Gulf Coast. The land in suit lies on Copano Bay in Aransas County, Texas. The respondents claim the proper boundary of the privately owned land on shore is the common law boundary along the contour line of 0.4 feet above sea level. The State, acting through Land Commissioner, J. Earl Rudder, et al, claims the true boundary line should be in accordance with Spanish and Mexican law. This point is 1.1 feet above sea level. The difference between these two elevations accounts for the vacancy. No party denies that the land covered by the sea under…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barney v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Hosner v. DeYoungTexas Supreme Court · 1846
  3. City of San Antonio v. StrumbergTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Stover v. GilbertTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Warren v. ShumanTexas Supreme Court · 1849

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Luttes v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Lewis v. Southmore Savings AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Strayhorn v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. Valmont PlantationsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. TH Investments, Inc. v. Kirby Inland Marine, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API