Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 14, 1987No. C-1-84-0988PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
Before this Court is the joint motion of The Cincinnati Post, The Dayton Daily News and Journal Herald, The Columbus Dispatch, and The Cincinnati Enquirer to intervene, under Rule 24(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., in the above-captioned case for the limited purpose of challenging the closure of the summary jury trial1 proceeding in this case and related motions (doc. 659), to which plaintiffs have responded in support of movant’s motion (doc. 666), and defendant General Electric has responded in opposition (doc. 665), and movants have replied (doc. 672). Defendant Sargent &…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cincinnati Gas And Electric Company v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Federal Reserve Bank v. Carey-Canada, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- McKay v. Ashland Oil, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1988
- United States v. Kentucky Utilities Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1989
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988