Legal Opinion
Pearce v. Austin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1985No. 16785-CAPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
465 So.2d 868 (1985)
C.G. PEARCE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Pete AUSTIN, dba Austin Construction Company, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 16785-CA.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
February 27, 1985.
Hayes, Harkey, Smith & Cascio by Thomas M. Hayes, III, Monroe, for plaintiff-appellant.
Grant & Dean by Philip T. Deal, Monroe, for defendant-appellee.
Before MARVIN and SEXTON, JJ., and PRICE, J. Pro Tem.
MARVIN, Judge.
In this action under the penalty wage statutes (LRS 23:631-632), Pearce, who resigned as a salesman for the defendant construction corporation, Austin, appeals that part of a judgment…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Arceneaux v. DomingueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Carriere v. Pee Wee's Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Orkin Exterminating Company v. FotiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Stell v. CaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Haywood v. SalterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ed Nowogroski Insurance v. RuckerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- ED NOWOGROSKI INS., INC. v. RuckerWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Alcide Foret and Bobby J. Dantin v. Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Potvin v. Wright's Sound Gallery, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Brown v. Navarre Chevrolet, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.