Legal Opinion

Walker v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 12, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Case 86 — 'Indictment against Mollie Walker por Keeping a Bawdy House APPEAL PROM HENDERSON CIRCUIT COURT. Dependant Convicted and Appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the court by

JUDGE HOBSON

Affirming.

Appellant was indicted and convicted of the offense of keeping a bawdy-house. Her punishment was fixed at a fine of $800. She complains that the court erred in admitting incompetent evidence against her, and that the Commonwealth attorney made a certain statement to the jury in his concluding argument.

The Commonwealth proved by a number of witnesses that the defendant kept a bawdy-house-; that her reputation for *728morality and chastity is bad; that the reputation of the women she kept was also bad; that the house was frequented by men and women of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arenz v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  2. Young v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API