Legal Opinion
Mary Ruth Burgess v. Edwin Meese as U.S. Attorney General and Immigration & Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 14, 1986No. 85-3916Published
1Opinion of the Court
802 F.2d 338
Mary Ruth BURGESS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Edwin MEESE as U.S. Attorney General and Immigration &
Naturalization Service, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 85-3916.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted March 4, 1986.
Decided Oct. 14, 1986.
Paul D. Edmondson, Yakima, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee.
Joan E. Smiley, Eloise Rosas, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendants-appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington.
Before WRIGHT, TANG and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.
TANG, Circuit Judge:
1
The Attorney General appeals…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Vasa Kaliski v. District Director of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Lau v. KileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Mary Ruth Burgess v. Edwin Meese as U.S. Attorney General and Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Rios v. CivilettiDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1983
- FULGENCIOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980