Legal Opinion

Visco v. City of Plainfield

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 1, 1948PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

Prosecutor complains of the action of the local board of adjustment dismissing his petition for leave to erect a one-story cement block addition — 14 ft. x 16 ft. — to a building in the rear of his premises Nos. 1163-1168 West Eront Street, in Plainfield, for produce cold storage and garage uses, and thus for business, in an area zoned for residential uses by the local zoning ordinance. The property has a frontage of 81.3 feet on West Eront Street and a depth of 138.16 feet on one side and 143.67 feet on the other, or a mean depth of…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grenewicz v. LighamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. Beck v. Board of Adjustment of East OrangeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Miriam Homes, Inc. v. BD. OF ADJ. CITY OF PERTH AMBOYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  4. Kindergan v. Board of Adjustment of River EdgeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API