Smiley v. Scott
Appellate Court of Illinois
Assumpsit, for labor and services. Trial in the Circuit Court of St. Clair County; the Hon. William Hartzell, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff. Appeal by defendant.'
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bigelow
Several errors are assigned but we shall notice only those relied on in appellant’s brief and argument, and consider those not urged as abandoned. Chicago City Railway Co. v. Van Vleck, 40 Ill. App. 367; Ludwig v. L. C. Huck Malting Co., 46 Ill. App. 494.
It is insisted that, the court erred in refusing to give to the jury the following instruction asked by the defendant, Viz: “ The court instructs the. jury that even though you believe from the evidence the plaintiff performed the services here sued for, in the hope or expectation of becoming one of the beneficiaries under the will of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. Van VleckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1891
- Meyer v. TemmeIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Ludwig v. L. C. Huck Malting Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1892
3Cited by2 opinions
- Morrissey v. FaucettWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Thomas v. ThomasWashington Supreme Court · 1919