United States v. Eighty-Eight (88) Designated Accounts Containing Monies Traceable to Exchanges for Controlled Substances
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OMNIBUS MEMORANDUM ORDER
NESBITT, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court upon several Claimants’ Motions to Dismiss, sup ported by an omnibus memorandum of law filed on May 30, 1990. A hearing on the issues raised in the omnibus memorandum was held on Friday, June 8, 1990, at which the United States, lead counsel for various Claimants, and other counsel were present and were heard thereon. For the reasons stated below, the Motions to Dismiss supported by the omnibus memorandum are DENIED. 1
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This unprecedented case began in the Northern District of Georgia, where on…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. HastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Certain Accounts, Together With All Monies on Deposit ThereinDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992
- Manufacturas International, Ltda. v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- United States v. Eighty-Eight (88) Designated Accounts Containing Monies Traceable to Exchanges for Controlled SubstancesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1992