Legal Opinion

Stroik v. Ponseti

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1997No. 96-CA-0842, 96-CA-1500PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

683 So.2d 1342 (1996)

Monica STROIK

v.

Wilbur PONSETI, Warren Woodfork, the City of New Orleans, and Royal Insurance Company.

Nos. 96-CA-0842, 96-CA-1500.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.

November 6, 1996.

Writ Granted February 7, 1997.

Dennis P. Couvillion, James Minge & Associates, New Orleans, for Plaintiff/Appellee Monica Stroik.

Franz L. Zibilich, Chief Deputy City Attorney, Avis Marie Russell, City Attorney, New Orleans, for Defendants/Appellants Wilbur Ponseti and City of New Orleans.

Before SCHOTT, C.J., and KLEES and WALTZER, JJ.

WALTZER, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Monica Stroik…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Canter v. Koehring CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  4. Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1962
  5. Ambrose v. New Orleans Police Amb. Serv.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stroik v. PonsetiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Westmoreland v. City of NatchitochesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Russell v. NoulletLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. Dyer v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API