Legal Opinion · Dissent

LDS Hospital, a Division of Intermountain Health Care, Inc. v. Capitol Life Insurance Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1988No. 20990, 21056Published

1DissentHowe, Associate Chief Justice

I dissent. I cannot agree that for the purposes of the instant case, the exception *862in the insurance policy is so ambiguous that it cannot be applied here. That exception provides that Capitol will not pay charges “arising out of. an attempt at assault or felony.” Similarly worded exceptions are commonly found in health and accident policies and in double indemnity clauses in life insurance policies. While this particular language could have been written more artfully, for the purposes of the instant case it is clear to me that at a minimum, Capitol did not want to be liable for medical and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barker v. California-Western States Life Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. Schwartz v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  3. Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company v. GibsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  4. Waters v. National Life & Accident Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  5. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API