Legal Opinion

Austin Dam & Suburban Railway Co. v. Goldstein

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 4, 1898PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Travis. Tried below before Hon. R. E. Brooks.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

This is a suit by the appellee against the appellant to recover damages on account of injuries sustained in a collision with one of the cars operated by appellant upon its street car track. The appellant operates a street car line upon the streets of the city of Austin. The appellee, while riding in a buggy upon the street, in attempting to cross the street car track, was struck by one of the moving cars on appellant’s road.

There is some evidence which has a tendency to show negligence upon the part of both parties; that upon the part of the appellant consisting in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nicol v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Cerrano v. Portland Ry. Light & Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Clark v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Ferrell v. Beaumont Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API