Lucas v. Smith
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Counsel for the plaintiff in error insist that under the Code, § 74-108, parental power of the father over his children can be lost only in one of the methods provided by such section; that the father in this instance had not lost his parental control and authority, and under the assignment of such parental authority to Mrs. Lucas, she was entitled to the possession, custody, and control of the minor children.' This section of the Code, if construed alone, would appear to authorize the contentions of counsel, but our system of law is not to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Williams v. CrosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Huntsinger v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Abernathy v. AbernathySupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
3Cited by29 opinions
- Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Perkins v. CoursonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Sale v. LeachmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- George v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Barnes v. TantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.