McLaughlin v. State
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Clay District Cou/rt. •The opinion of the court contains a sufficient statement of the facts. The district court, at the May Term 1875, sustained a demurrer to the petition of Wesley McLaughlin to vacate a judgment previously rendered by said court; and from such decision said Wesley McLaughlin appeals, and brings the case here on error for review.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This was an action brought by Wesley McLaughlin, and Adelaide H. McLaughlin, administratrix of the estate of Johnson B. McLaughlin deceased, to vacate a *284certain judgment previously rendered against said Wesley and said Johnson B. on a forfeited recognizance previously executed by said Johnson B. as principal, and said Wesley McLaughlin and one William A. Keith as sureties. (For additional facts concerning said judgment and said recognizance, see McLaughlin v. The State, 10 Kas. 582.) The only thing set forth in the plaintiff’s petition as…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Woolfolk v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1858