In re Estate of Grimm
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeals, Nos. 14 and 18, Jan. T., 1897, by Peter Monroe, executor et al., from decree of O. C. Phila. Co., July T., 1895, No. 240, overruling exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. Before Ashman, J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned were in overruling exceptions to adjudication.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Fell,
Victor B. Grimm at the time of his death was engaged in the retail liquor business. By his will he left all of his property to his wife, and appointed the appellant executor. The fixtures of the saloon and the stock of liquors were appraised at $50.00, and the widow became a purchaser of them from the executor at that price. She leased the property in which the business had been conducted by her husband, and two weeks after his death she petitioned the court of quarter sessions to transfer the license to her. Her petition was granted by the court, and she conducted…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re BlumenthalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
3Cited by16 opinions
- Feitz EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- In re Estate of BuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
- Pichler v. SnavelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Aschenbach v. CareySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Cronin v. SharpSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.