Legal Opinion · Dissent

Trimble v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 12, 1962No. D-40Published

1DissentRawls, Judge

The majority opinion did not see fit to set forth proceedings had between the prosecutor, the witness Thompson (Florida Sheriff’s Bureau Special Agent), the defendant’s attorney, the court, and witness Thompson’s testimony, concerning the admissibility of an excerpt of the contents of Cotita’s statement.

The following extracts from the transcript are material:

“Q. [Prosecutor] Will you tell us, Mr. Thompson, what the defendant did and what he said at the Sheriff’s office concerning these particular items that I just now asked you about?
“A. [Thompson] Well, now, he was actually questioned in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Anthony v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1902
  2. Rankin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  3. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1888
  4. McDowell v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API