Southern Pac. Ry. Co. v. State
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BICKLEY, C. J.
There is no dispute as to the facts, and but one legal question involved in this case.
Does section 233, c. 133, Laws 1921, require a county-treasurer, who discovers that real estate has been omitted in the assessment of any year or number of years, to place said real estate upon the assessment roll for all the omitted years including those in excess of 5 years?
The material portion of said section is as follows:
“If the assessor shall, at any time before the delivery of the assessment roll to the county treasurer, discover that any personal property has been…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Ragland v. Alpha Aviation, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
- Besser Company v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
- New Mexico Electric Service Co. v. JonesNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Cochrell v. MitchellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Amarillo-Pecos Valley Truck Lines, Inc. v. GallegosNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.