Legal Opinion

Grant v. Grant

New York Family Court

Decided December 15, 1969PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichabds W. Hannah, J.

This proceeding presents the issue of whether a husband can avoid paying an order of support for his wife by voluntarily retiring from his position. This issue also extends to a husband or father who threatens to retire to avoid an order of support being made against him. This practice affects the wives and children of men who retire upon social security benefits and pensions. Recently, this court has heard many men, ranging from the $80-a-week worker to the $36,000-a-year professional, say that because of their right to retire the obligation to support is terminated or radically decreased.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knutson v. KnutsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Jenkins v. JenkinsNew York Family Court · 1942
  3. Appleton v. AppletonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Lorenzo v. LorenzoNew York Family Court · 1944
  5. Andrews v. AndrewsNew York Family Court · 1938

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wanamaker v. WanamakerNew York City Family Court · 1978
  2. Weiner v. WeinerNew York City Family Court · 1979
  3. Villano v. VillanoNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Felisa L. D. v. Allen M.New York City Family Court · 1980
  5. Skiff v. SkiffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API