Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Vandervoort
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 15, 1832PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion to stay proceedings until "the costs of a former suit prosecuted by the plaintiff by another person than the one now appearing as guardian in the superior court of the city of New-York. It was objected that the court would not compel the payment of costs in a suit in another court, and that the present guardian at all events should riot be made responsible for them, but the Court decided that the motion must be granted.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Buckles v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1891
- Ex parte ShearSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- People ex rel. Barry v. MerceinNew York Supreme Court · 1842
- Solinskie v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Solinskie v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915