Legal Opinion

Whitsitt v. Ramsay

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 12, 1986No. 69636Published

1Opinion of the Court

719 S.W.2d 333 (1986)

Michael Ray WHITSITT, Applicant

v.

Hon. Lanny RAMSAY, Judge, 8th Judicial District Court, and Hon. Patsy P. Barton, County-District Clerk, Respondents.

No. 69636.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc.

November 12, 1986.

R.K. Weaver, Dallas, Walter C. Prentice, Austin, for applicant.

Jim Mattox, Atty. Gen., and Mary F. Keller & F. Scott McCown, Asst. Attys. Gen., Austin, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for respondents.

Before the court en banc.

OPINION

WHITE, Judge.

This is an original application for writ of mandamus by which applicant seeks to have a post-trial order…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Campbell; Concurrence · Onion; Concurrence · Miller.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Homan v. HughesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Texas Board of Pardons & Paroles v. MillerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Dickens v. PalmerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API