Legal Opinion

Tuckerman v. Corbin

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 15, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Trial by the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, C. J.

Upon the trial of this action the following facts were conceded:

1. That prior to the commencement of this action the plaintiff commenced suit upon a promissory note made by the defendant and payable to. the plaintiff’s order, and to that suit the defendant pleaded a counter-claim against the plaintiff amounting to the sum of $5,500.

2. That • under the statute applicable to this court, the counter-claim pleaded, if recoverable at all, is recoverable in *405that action “without respect to the amount thereof” {Code, sec. 3174).

3. That the present action is upon a. promissory note of like tenor and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. CuylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Hatch v. BentonNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Gleason v. MoenThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
  4. Fabbricotti v. LaunitzThe Superior Court of New York City · 1851
  5. Fuller v. ReadThe Superior Court of New York City · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merritt v. GouleyNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Jefferson County National Bank v. DusckasNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Perkins v. Merchants' Lithographing Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1897
  4. A. B. Aldus Realty Co. v. BreslofCity of New York Municipal Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API