Legal Opinion

Jewell v. Washington Utilities & Transportation Commission

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1978No. 44800PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

Should charitable contributions by privately owned telephone companies be paid by the telephone users or by the companies' stockholders? That is the issue in this case.

In two telephone rate setting cases, the Utilities and Transportation Commission (commission) allowed charitable contributions to be included as part of the expenses of doing business in establishing telephone rates pursuant to RCW 80.01.040(3). This allowance was a change in policy by the commission which had previously denied contributions as an expense to be taken into account in determining rates.

Appellants are subscribers…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Davenport Water Co. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
  3. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  4. Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionConnecticut Superior Court · 1970

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Tanner Electric Cooperative v. Puget Sound Power & LightWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Electric Lightwave, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  3. US West Communications, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People's Organization for Washington Energy Resources v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. US West Communications, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API