Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1913No. 4442PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action for damages; from city court of Tifton — Judge E. Eve. September 11, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.

1. The recovery of damages which can not legally be measured by any other standard than the enlightened conscience of impartial jurors can not be set aside upon the ground that it is excessive, unless it is manifestly the result of prejudice, bias, or corrupt motive. Southern Railway Co. v. Wright, 6 Ga. App. 172 (64 S. E. 703); Murphy v. Meacham, 1 Ga. App. 155 (57 S. E. 1046); Merchants & Miners Transportation Co. v. Corcoran, 4 Ga. App. 654 (62 S. E. 130).

2. “Inasmuch as enforced idleness or diminished efficiency in offices of labor is calculated to give rise to mental distress, it is not…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Powell v. Augusta & Summerville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  2. Merchants & Miners Transportation Co. v. CorcoranCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  4. Atlanta Street Railroad v. JacobsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Murphy v. MeachamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trammell v. Atlanta Coach Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Rome Railway & Light Co. v. DukeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  3. King v. SharpeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  4. Prettyman v. TopkisSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
  5. Pidcock v. WestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API