Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Payne

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 29, 1987No. C1-86-2093Published

1DissentLeslie, Judge

I respectfully dissent because I am of the opinion that State v. Berg, 383 N.W.2d 7 (Minn.Ct.App.1986) cannot be adequately distinguished. I would reverse and hold that the trial court erred in suppressing *277evidence found on Payne after what I perceive to be a lawful search.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986