Lamar v. Lamar
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
WALDEN, Chief Judge.
Husband appeals from a modification order entered after a final dissolution. We agree with husband’s contention that the trial court should not have ordered him to pay $1,445 for wife’s attorney fees based only upon her counsel’s affidavits of work done and fees charged. In Ortiz v. Ortiz, 211 So.2d 243 (3d DCA Fla.1968), the court noted:
“. . . a chancellor may not fix attorney’s fees without expert testimony. Lyle v. Lyle, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 256; Thoni v. Thoni, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 420.” Id. at 245.
The attorney fees should not have been awarded without testimony…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lyle v. LyleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Black v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Ortiz v. OrtizDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Thoni v. ThoniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Stern v. SternSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sierra v. SierraSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Island Hoppers, Ltd. v. KeithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- Tanner v. TannerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Mullane v. LorenzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Lee v. GILBERT, SILVERSTEIN, HELLMANDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.