Legal Opinion

Lamar v. Lamar

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 5, 1975No. 75-345PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALDEN, Chief Judge.

Husband appeals from a modification order entered after a final dissolution. We agree with husband’s contention that the trial court should not have ordered him to pay $1,445 for wife’s attorney fees based only upon her counsel’s affidavits of work done and fees charged. In Ortiz v. Ortiz, 211 So.2d 243 (3d DCA Fla.1968), the court noted:

“. . . a chancellor may not fix attorney’s fees without expert testimony. Lyle v. Lyle, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 256; Thoni v. Thoni, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 420.” Id. at 245.

The attorney fees should not have been awarded without testimony…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lyle v. LyleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  2. Black v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Ortiz v. OrtizDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. Thoni v. ThoniDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  5. Stern v. SternSupreme Court of Florida · 1954

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sierra v. SierraSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Island Hoppers, Ltd. v. KeithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Tanner v. TannerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Mullane v. LorenzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
  5. Lee v. GILBERT, SILVERSTEIN, HELLMANDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API