Legal Opinion

Clare v. Freedman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 5, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtM altbte, C. J.

For some twenty years before 1932 the plaintiff had purchased goods of the defendant upon a running account upon which the former made payments from time to time. In 1924 the plaintiff loaned the defendant $3000, which was unpaid in December, 1932. He asked the defendant for a settlement and the latter prepared and presented to him a statement of account, showing $810.39 to be due the plaintiff. In this statement were included three charges against the plaintiff for interest upon the sums due upon the open account, amounting in all to $317.44. The defendant at the same time gave the plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. . ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Selleck v. FrenchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1814
  3. Crucible Steel Co. of America v. Premier Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  4. Hanley Co., Inc. v. American Cement Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  5. Crosby v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1865

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gorfain v. GorfainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Fromson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API