Legal Opinion

Bordell v. General Electric Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Loren N. Brown, J.

The plaintiff moves for an order dismissing defendant General Electric’s (G.E.) counterclaim. The motion is opposed.

This action has its antecedents in the plaintiff’s employment *476at Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory (KAPL) in Niskayuna, New York. KAPL is owned by the United States Government and administered by the Department of Energy (DOE). G.E. operates KAPL as a contractor for DOE. The plaintiff worked for G.E. as a health physicist-radiological engineer, and, as part of his employment, measured employee exposure to radiation at KAPL. Upon an apparent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burnett Process, Inc. v. Richlar Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. In re the Estate of TuduriNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  3. In re the Arbitration between Wolsky & DuchovnyNew York Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API