Legal Opinion

Van Syckel v. Johnson

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 13, 1908PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Ou bill for construction of will. Heard on bill and proofs taken ex parte.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, V. C.

This bill was filed by the surviving executor and trustee under the will and codicil of the late Aaron Van Syckel, and by other persons beneficially interested in the estate of the testator as residuary legatees, for the construction of the second codicil to the testator’s will, and for direction as to the distribution of the trust fund therein created, in case that provision of the codicil shall be held to be invalid. So much of the codicil as is perti-nent to this inquiry reads as follows :

“Second. I give and bequeath to my Executors or the survivors or survivor of them, the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HelmerOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Tichenor v. Mech. Metals Nat. Bk. of N.Y.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
  3. Burke v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1990
  4. Mills v. Montclair Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
  5. Noice v. SchnellNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API