Legal Opinion

Borough of Latrobe v. Sweeney

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1975No. Appeal, No. 108 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

This is a zoning appeal from the decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Westmoreland County reversing the order of the Latrobe Borough Zoning Board of Adjust*358ment (Board) denying a use variance to Dr. Paul B. Sweeney (Sweeney).

The lower court took the case on an agreed set of facts which revealed that on April 23, 1970, Sweeney, a dentist, and the appellee herein, purchased two lots in an R-2 Residential Zone of the Borough of Latrobe. He planned to build thereon his family residence, with a dental office as a permitted accessory use, and he obtained a building permit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Filanowski v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Camp Hill Development Co. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Szmigiel v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. McKay v. Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Bamash v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Marlowe v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Hager v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Nowicki v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Andreucci v. ZHB, L. MILFORD TWP.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Zoning Hearing Board v. PetroskyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API