Legal Opinion

Castillo v. Euresti

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1979No. 1384PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BISSETT, Justice.

The principal issue presented by this appeal is whether the granting of defendant’s motion for an instructed verdict was proper. Theodore F. Castillo, plaintiff, filed suit against Josefa R. Euresti, defendant, on November 4, 1974, whereby he sought to recover title to and possession of a certain lot in Corpus Christi, Texas. Trial was to a jury. At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, defendant, in open court, orally moved for an instructed verdict, which was granted. Judgment that plaintiff take nothing was duly rendered and signed. Plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seideneck v. Cal Bayreuther AssociatesTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Harvey v. ElderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Marlin Associates v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  4. State Highway Department v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Shapiro v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dillard v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  2. Dillard v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Raul Flores, Inc. v. Adrian D. Rodriguez and L & F Distributors, L. L. C., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API