Legal Opinion
State v. Van Daalen
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1943No. File No. 8576PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
The defendants were tried on an information presented and filed in the Municipal Court of the City of Watertown, Codington County, South Dakota. Counts I and II of .the information read:
“Count I. Said defendants at and in the County of Codington, in the State of South Dakota, during the month of December, 1941, and during the month of January, 1942, did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously engage in and transact business as retailers, without any permit to engage in or transact such business having been issued to them by the Director of Taxation of the State of South Dakota, all contrary to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Grosjean v. American Press Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. DrasinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- City of Los Angeles v. Rancho Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Berdahl v. GillisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. King Colony RanchMontana Supreme Court · 1960
- Holy Spirit Ass'n for the Unification of World Christianity v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.