Cordeville v. Hosmer
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE EIGHTH DISTRICT, FOR THE PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. This is an hypothecary action against the defendant, as third possessor of three lots of ground in the town of Mandeville.
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF THE EIGHTH DISTRICT, FOR THE PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY, THE JUDGE THEREOF PRESIDING. This is an hypothecary action against the defendant, as third possessor of three lots of ground in the town of Mandeville. The plaintiffs allege they are the holders of two n.otes, dated the 22d September, 1837, payable eighteen months after date, one for four hundred and twenty-five dollars and the other for seven hundred dollars, executed by J. Penas, to the order of, and endorsed Jean Perjole Y Ripole; and that said notes were all protested for non-payment at maturity, but are secured…
1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.
This is an hypothecary action against the third possessor of three lots of ground in the town of Mandeville. The plaintiffs allege they are the holders of two promissory notes signed by J. Penas, payable to the order of, and endorsed by Jean Perjole Y Ripole, the payment of which is secured by mortgage on the three town lots in question.. .. A monition has no other eftect theTpurehaser against the fendant in exeany°no\herhperson, resulting guiárity in the othlr16proceedthefsaie makins The vendor of lots, when opposed by the builder’s claim and privilege on ed*'is entitledto have the ground…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Succession of BienvenuSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- City Bank of New Orleans v. WaldenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1846
- McDonough v. Le RoySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
- Atkins v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1944
- New Orleans Land Co. v. Southern States Fair-Pan-American Exposition Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918