Legal Opinion
State v. Walla
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The defendant was indicted for forgery in the third degree by a grand jury in Burleigh county. He moved to set aside the indictment on the grounds:(1) That the jury list from which the names of the grand jurors were drawn did not contain two hundred names as required by § 826, Comp. Laws 1913; but that said list contained only one hundred seventy-nine names.(2) That the city commissioners of the City of Bismarck in selecting the names for the jury list,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. Sacramento Butchers' Protective Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- State v. LongstrethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- United States v. GreeneDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1902
- People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Kitts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. NordquistNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Dixon v. KaufmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Seay v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- State v. PickusSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Bumann v. MaurerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.