Legal Opinion

McNeilly v. Department of Employment & Economic Development

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 16, 2010No. A09-895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Pro se relator Nathaniel McNeilly challenges a determination by the unemployment-law judge (ULJ) that he is ineligible for unemployment benefits due to his failure to actively seek employment following a regular layoff from his seasonal employer. Because we conclude that relator is required to comply with the statutory requirements in order to be eligible for unemployment benefits and because substantial evidence in the record supports the ULJ’s determination that relator was not actively seeking employment, we affirm.

FACTS

Relator works as a foreman for Keenan &…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  2. State v. GarzaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Herbst v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Decker v. City Pages, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Monson v. Minnesota Department of Employment ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McNeilly v. DEPT. OF EMPLOY. & ECON. DEV.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API