Legal Opinion

Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. v. Sfc Co. Ltd.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 15, 2017No. 2016-2721PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judge.

Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. (“Idemitsu”) seeks review of the July 29, 2016 decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) finding claims 1-5, 7-11, 13, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 8,334,648 (“the ’648 patent”) invalid as obvious over International Publication WO 02/052904 (“Arakane”). See SFC Co. Ltd. v. Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd., No. IPR2015-00564, 2016 Pat. App. LEXIS 13340 (P.T.A.B. July 29, 2016). For the following reasons, we affirm.

I. Background

Idemitsu is the owner of the ’648 patent, titled “Organic Electroluminescence Device and Organic Light Emitting…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. On-Line Careline, Inc. v. America Online, Inc., (Substituted for Compuserve, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  3. Perfect Web Technologies, Inc. v. InfoUSA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  4. Para-Ordnance Manufacturing, Inc. v. Sgs Importers International, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
  5. In Re Alberto Lee BigioCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adapt Pharma Operations v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  2. Adapt Pharma Operations v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
  3. Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
  4. Valencell, Inc. v. Fitbit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API