Legal Opinion

Hayes v. Muller

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 5, 1963No. 46472Published

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

HAMITER, Justice.

A rehearing was granted in this case :so that we might reconsider our holding (on an exception of no cause of action) that the plaintiffs had stated a cause of action in their demand for the recovery ■of profits derived from the purchase and .sale of a certain oil and gas lease.

The facts, as set forth in the opinion of the Court of Appeal (146 So.2d 176, 195) when certifying the legal questions involved, are as follows: “Under the allegations of the petition of plaintiffs Hayes and Knox, they and the defendant Muller entered into an oral agreement of joint…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hanby v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1916
  2. Scurto v. Le BlancSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  3. Wampler v. WamplerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
  4. Ingersoll Corporation v. RogersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
  5. Eberle v. EberleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API