Commissioner of Banks
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
1. The main question presented for decision in these cases is whether a dividend ought to be paid to the depositors in the savings departments in trust companies (which are being liquidated by the commissioner of banks under St. 1910, c. 399, as amended, now G. L. c. 167, §§ 22 to 36), on the face of their several claims without deduction for dividends already paid and for the value of special security set apart by law but not yet realized for the benefit of depositors in the savings departments, or whether such dividend ought to be paid only on the balance due on such several claims after…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Merrill v. National Bank of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
- Mabardy v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Amory v. FrancisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1820
- Greenfield Savings Bank v. AbercrombieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United Security Trust Company CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- International Paper Co. v. Priscilla Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Commissioner of Banks in re Prudential Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Goldband v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Towle v. Commissioner of BanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.