Georgia State Conference of the NAACP v. Georgia
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Concurring in the judgmentDuffey, District Judge
I concur with the majority’s ultimate holding that the claims in Counts One and Three should be dismissed for their failure to state a plausible claim, and that Plaintiffs’ Fourteenth Amendment claim against the State, asserted under § 1983, should be dismissed because we have no subject matter jurisdiction to consider it. I do not join in the decision to recite the long list of allegations in the Complaint because most aré not germane to the legal issues before this Court and because many of the allegations are conclusory and opinionated.
I write separately to underscore my regret that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Wisconsin Department of Corrections v. SchachtSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mandel v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.