Legal Opinion
United States v. Washington, Virgina & Mary Land Coach Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 13, 1967No. Civ. A. Nos. 1172-63, 2874-63PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIRICA, District Judge.
This litigation involves a complex factual background and numerous legal issues; however, one issue stands out as paramount. That issue is whether the Secretary of the Interior through his delegate, the Director of the National Park Service, has discretionary power to limit suburban commuter bus traffic on part of the George Washington Memorial Parkway while not limiting such traffic on other parts of the Parkway. This litigation involves only those parts of the Parkway which are on the Virginia side of the Potomac River. Included in this issue is whether the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Willapoint Oysters, Inc. v. EwingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Udall v. Washington, Virginia & Maryland Coach Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
- Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc., D.C. Transitsystem, Inc., Intervenor. United States of America v. Washington, Virginia and Maryland Coach Company, Inc., D.C. Transitsystem, Inc., Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission, and Virginiastate Corporation Commission, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968