Legal Opinion

Ullian v. Ullian

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 2, 1975PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff’s appeal from an interlocutory decree sustaining the defendant’s plea in bar brings nothing before this court where, as here, the appeal taken by the plaintiff from the final decree dismissing her bill was not seasonable. G. L. c. 214, § 19, as in effect prior to St. 1973, c. 1114, § 62. See Radio Corp. of America v. Raytheon Mfg. Co. 300 Mass. 113, 120 (1938); Fusaro v. Murray, 300 Mass. 229, 231 (1938). It may be appropriate to add that were we to have dealt with the case on its merits, our conclusions would not have differed from those of the trial judge in sustaining the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gabriel v. BorowyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Radio Corp. of America v. Raytheon Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Woodard v. WoodardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Ranicar v. GoodwinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  5. Fusaro v. MurrayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Donnelly v. Appeals CourtMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API