Legal Opinion

Ingraham v. Marr

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 20, 2000No. A00A1290PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

While driving a car belonging to Morris Drane, Francis Ingraham hit a car driven by Charles Marr. Marr sued Ingraham for negligently causing his injuries, and he sued Drane under a theory of respondeat superior. Drane moved for summary judgment, arguing that he could not be held liable for any of Ingraham’s allegedly negligent acts. Ingraham sought either summary judgment or dismissal, asserting that Marr failed to serve him within the statute of limitation. The trial court denied both motions, and we granted defendants’ interlocutory appeal. For reasons that follow, we reverse.

1…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Mazur v. Food Giant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  3. Withrow Timber Co. v. BlackburnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  4. Patterson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Johnson v. Dallas Glass Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Feinour v. Ricker Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  2. Patterson v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. William Gordon Clyatt v. Grady Electric Membership CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2018
  4. Wells v. Drain Doctor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Williams v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API